Tapping the Vagus Nerve: Could a Gentle Electrical Pulse Fine-Tune Performance, Mood and Recovery?
By Dr Andrew Crockett
Vagal nerve stimulation for performance enhancement
Why is the vagus nerve getting so much attention?
From challenging work situations to Strava leader-boards, people are evermore aware of ways to monitor their life-load and recover faster afterwards. At the centre of this sits the vagus nerve. Roughly 80% of its fibres carry information up to the brain, providing live “telemetry” on the body’s parasympathetic balance. Surgeons have long implanted electrodes around the cervical vagus to treat epilepsy and depression. Now pocket-sized gadgets promise to reach the same pathway through the skin of the outer ear or neck to stimulate the vagus nerve (transcutaneous VNS, or tVNS).
What is tVNS?
Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) is an emerging non-invasive therapeutic technique that involves the application of electrical impulses to the vagus nerve through the skin, primarily at the ear. This innovative method has gained attention for its potential to enhance both performance and long-term health benefits, particularly in the fields of athletics, cognitive function, and stress management. Notably, tVNS has been shown to improve cognitive functions such as attention, executive control, and memory, making it a promising tool for athletes seeking to optimize their performance under pressure.
This raises a practical question: can non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation genuinely boost the performance, recovery or long-term health of otherwise well people?
The State of the Evidence
Heart-rate variability may not shift as easily as headlines suggest.
Two Bayesian meta-analyses pooling 16 -17 randomised trials found that a single ear-based tVNS session did not reliably raise HRV in healthy adults. Some individual studies have reported modest HRV gains, especially in older participants, morning sessions or after several days of use, but the overall picture is mixed.
Sympathetic “fight-or-flight” traffic can drop on contact.
Two studies found that active tVNS quickly lowers nerve signals that tighten muscles and raise blood pressure. Changes in blood pressure and reflex control were smaller and depended a lot on where the electrodes were placed.
The brainstem circuit lights up.
Functional MRIs show that certain areas linked to stress and emotion light up. Studies on brain waves and pupil size demonstrate that brain waves slow down and pupils quickly widen, which means the brain is releasing more noradrenaline, a chemical linked to alertness and stress.
Cognition function.
Early research shows that tVNS may help both people with memory problems and healthy adults. Short bursts of stimulation helps people to focus and improve reaction tests. It also increased a brain signal linked to attention. In a small pilot study, continuous cervical (neck) stimulation improved how people noticed sounds and images. In older adults with mild cognitive impairment or dementia, some studies have found better scores on memory and thinking tests after tVNS. For example, one 2022 trial found that people improved on a general mental ability test and a verbal memory task compared to sham stimulation.
Even healthy people, both young and old, can see short-term benefits. One study found that a single session improved remembering face–name pairs and episodic memory in healthy older adults. Another found that young adults showed better mental flexibility after tVNS. Other small studies suggest possible improvements in recognising emotions, creative thinking, and focus.
However, results are mixed. A recent analysis of 19 studies found that overall effects are small, with some mental skills (like executive function) improving more than others (like memory or attention).
First exercise studies are encouraging.
A rigorous crossover trial found that 30 minutes of daily ear stimulation for one week raised VO₂ peak by around 1 ml/kg/min and increased peak work rate. Single sessions of tVNS during cycling lowers your maximum heart rate but keeps the amount of blood pumped with each beat the same.
Sleep and mood appear to benefit over days to weeks.
Two-week bedtime protocols improved both device-measured and subjective sleep quality, and repeated sessions lifted positive mood and wellbeing, particularly in those starting from a lower baseline.
Inflammation data are inconclusive.
One trial found that tVNS reduced certain inflammation markers (IL-1β and TNF-α).
Another saw a short-term rise in some immune signals in the blood.
In other words, the brain responds to tVNS quite reliably, but body-level signals such as HRV behave unpredictably, outcomes depend on when and how you stimulate and researchers must use a truly inactive placebo, because even a mild buzz on the earlobe can nudge alertness and heart-rate variability.
Thinking of experimenting? A pragmatic checklist
Be clear on your aim. Calming pre-sleep arousal, sharpening focus before deep work, or nudging endurance each call for different schedules.
Stick to proven anatomy. Inner-ear zones innervated by the auricular branch (cymba conchae or tragus) show the most consistent effects. Behind-ear placements are weaker, the earlobe is mainly useful as a placebo.
Follow a common recipe. Positive studies usually employ biphasic pulses 100-500 µs wide, 10-30 Hz, at a perceptible yet comfortable current for 15-30 minutes. Ultra-slow or ultra-fast frequencies seldom help.
Collect your own baseline. Track HRV, sleep or reaction-time metrics for a week before starting, otherwise random daily swings will masquerade as progress.
Run short cycles, then reassess. A one- or two-week daily programme is long enough to see whether you are a “responder”.
Expect incremental gains. In healthy adults improvements are typically measured in percentage points, not super-powers.
Check the safety notes. Avoid tVNS if you have a pacemaker, recent ear surgery, or skin conditions at the stimulation site. Reported side-effects are mostly mild tingling or transient dizziness.
Available devices
Nurosym (ear clip) CE-marked wellness device (~£600). Backed by the largest peer-review footprint (>40 papers), adjustable intensity, app-timed 15-30 minute sessions.
gammaCore Sapphire (handheld neck stimulator) Prescription-only in the UK. CE and FDA-cleared for migraine and cluster headache. Two-minute bursts applied to the cervical vagus. Strong clinical evidence for headache, but less for general wellbeing.
Neuvana Xen (earbuds) CE-marked for wellness (~£350). Syncs pulse timing to music via Bluetooth, popular for relaxation routines, but scientific data are sparse.
Pulsetto (neck collar) CE-certified wellness device (~£450). Four-minute pre-set programmes for “Stress”, “Sleep” and “Burn-out”. Limited peer-reviewed research so far.
Hoolest VeRelief (handheld auricular probe) No formal certification (~£240). Five intensity settings, 60-day money-back guarantee. Minimal published data.
BrainPatch (over-ear headset, only on pre-order) Still in beta, aims for closed-loop EEG-guided stimulation. No price yet, research grade only.
Choosing wisely
Look for a CE or UKCA mark to ensure basic safety testing.
Scan for peer-reviewed data rather than influencer testimonials.
Choose a device style that fits when and where you plan to use it (?earbuds for commuting, ?collar for bedtime, handheld for brief daytime “spot” sessions).
Note that none of these products carries a UK medical claim for everyday performance enhancement, so any personal use is strictly at your own discretion.
Where next?
Closed-loop systems that sync pulses to your breathing pattern are entering beta testing, while apps are learning to adjust frequency based on real-time pupil size or ECG. Researchers are now asking whether our DNA helps determine who benefits most. A prime candidate is the gene CHRNA7 which is a key switch in the vagus-driven anti-inflammatory pathway. Common CHRNA7 variants might therefore predict why one person feels a clear boost from tVNS while another notices very little. The two big gaps remain standardised outcome measures and truly inert placebos, until those tighten, reviews will continue to oscillate between excitement and scepticism.
Bottom line
Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation is neither ‘snake oil’ nor a silver bullet. Think of it as a fine-tuning knob, a way to nudge autonomic balance, cognitive arousal and possibly endurance, provided it is layered onto solid sleep, nutrition and training. In domains where marginal gains compound, a well-timed 20-minute pulse may soon sit alongside the morning breath-work routine and the standing desk. Continue to explore with curiosity, track with discipline and remember that the body is complex and honest progress takes both patience and precision.
References
Ackland G., Gourine A. et al. (2025). Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation and exercise capacity in healthy volunteers: a randomised trial. European Heart Journal.
Atanackov P. et al. (2025). The acute effects of varying frequency and pulse width of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on heart rate variability in healthy adults. Biomedicines.
Badran B.W. et al. (2017). Neurophysiologic effects of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation via electrical stimulation of the tragus: a concurrent taVNS/fMRI study and review. Brain Stimulation 10, (2) (379-386).
Bretherton B. et al. (2019). Effects of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation in individuals aged 55 years or above: potential benefits of daily stimulation. Aging 11, (14) (4836-4857).
Cheng C. et al. (2024). Can earlobe stimulation serve as a sham for transcutaneous auricular vagus stimulation? Psychophysiology 61, e14444.
Clancy J.A. et al. (2014). Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation in healthy humans reduces sympathetic nerve activity. Brain Stimulation 7 (6) (871-877).
Ferstl M. et al. (2020). Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation boosts mood recovery after effort exertion. Psychological Medicine 50 (5) (815-825).
Frangos E. et al. (2015). Non-invasive access to the vagus nerve central projections via electrical stimulation of the external ear: fMRI evidence in humans. Brain Stimulation 8 (3) (624-636).
Gauthey A. et al. (2020). Sympathetic effect of auricular transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation on healthy subjects. Frontiers in Physiology 11, 523.
Geng D. et al. (2022). The effect of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on HRV in healthy young people. PLOS ONE 17 (3) e0263678.
Gianlorenço A.C. et al. (2024). Age as an effect modifier of the effects of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on heart rate variability in healthy subjects. Journal of Clinical Medicine 13 (2) 349.
Gurtubay I. et al. (2023). Immediate effects and duration of a short application of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on P300 event‐related potentials. Frontiers in Neuroscience 17, 1151555.
Jacobs, H. I., Riphagen, J. M., Razat, C. M., Wiese, S., and Sack, A. T. (2015). Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation boosts associative memory in older individuals. Neurobiol. Aging 36, 1860–1867. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.02.023
Jigo M. et al. (2024). Transcutaneous cervical vagus nerve stimulation improves sensory performance in humans. Scientific Reports 14 (1) 516.
Kania A.M. et al. (2021). Activation of the cholinergic anti-inflammatory reflex by occipito-atlantal decompression and transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation. Journal of Osteopathic Medicine 121 (6) (563-573).
Le Roy B. et al. (2023). Evaluation of taVNS for extreme environments: an exploration study of health benefits and stress operationality. Frontiers in Neurology 14, 1134733.
Monti D.A. et al. (2025). Changes in brain functional connectivity associated with transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation in healthy controls. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 19, 1220769.
Perçin A. et al. (2024). The effect of in-ear and behind-ear transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on autonomic function. Journal of Clinical Medicine 13 (5) 1213.
Ridgewell, C., Heaton, K. J., Hildebrandt, A., Couse, J., Leeder, T., and Neumeier, W. H.. (2021). The effects of transcutaneous auricular vagal nerve stimulation on cognition in healthy individuals: A meta-analysis. Neuropsychology, 35, 352–365. doi: 10.1037/neu0000735
Osińska A, Rynkiewicz A, Binder M, Komendziński T, Borowicz A, Leszczyński A. Non-invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Treatment of Disorders of Consciousness - Longitudinal Case Study. Front Neurosci. 2022 May 6;16:834507. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.834507.
Sharon O. & Nir Y. (2020). Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation induces pupil dilation and attenuates alpha oscillations. Journal of Neuroscience 40 (26) (4991-5001).
Subramoniam A. et al. (2024). Effect of daily transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation on objective and subjective sleep features in healthy adults. Sleep 47 (Suppl 1) A120.
Tobaldini E. et al. (2019). Cardiac and peripheral autonomic responses to orthostatic stress during transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation in healthy subjects. Journal of Clinical Medicine 8 (4) 496.
Trifilio E, Shortell D, Olshan S, O'Neal A, Coyne J, Lamb D, Porges E, Williamson J. Impact of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation on healthy cognitive and brain aging. Front Neurosci. 2023 Jul 28;17:1184051. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1184051.
Veiz E. et al. (2022). Increased concentrations of circulating interleukins following non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation. Neuroimmunomodulation 29 (6) (362-371).
Wang, L., Zhang, J., Guo, C., He, J., Zhang, S., Wang, Y., et al. (2022). The efficacy and safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a double blinded randomized clinical trial. Brain Stimul. 15, 1405–1414. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2022.09.003
Wienke C. et al. (2023). Phasic, event-related transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation modifies behavioural, pupillary, and low-frequency oscillatory responses. Journal of Neuroscience 43 (13) (2207-2222).
Wolf V. et al. (2021). Does transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation affect vagally mediated heart-rate variability? A living Bayesian meta-analysis. Psychophysiology 58 (10) e13951.
Yoshida Y. et al. (2025). Effects of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on haemodynamics and autonomic function during exercise stress tests in healthy volunteers. Circulation Reports 7 (4) (197-207).
